Advancing New Hampshire Public Education

Home » Common Core » Common Core Supporters Firing Back – EdWeek

Common Core Supporters Firing Back – EdWeek

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


New Hampshire’s implementation of Common Core State Standards is well down the road.  I’ve seen it rolled out and working in 5th grade classrooms.  Teachers are surprised at how successful they have been and the kids were clearly animated during my visits.  But critics persist, some suspicious of federal involvement (the Common Core State Standards are actually an initiative launched from the National Governor’s Association), others critical of various elements of the standards.  Here’s a good summary of myths and facts done by the NEA as part of this longer document.  Here’s are highlights from EdWeek’s good state-by-state overview of the debate:


Even as supporters say common core remains on track, they say they are taking its opponents seriously.

When the Tennessee education department started getting basic but increasingly frequent questions about the standards—along the lines of “Is the federal government now telling us what textbooks we have to purchase?”—supporters saw the need to act, said state Commissioner of Education Kevin Huffman.

“We realized that we had to start at square one and be able to start telling people, ‘OK, this is the story of Tennessee’s engagement with the common core,’ ” Mr. Huffman said.

In recent weeks, there have been renewed efforts in Tennessee from the State Collaborative to Reform Education, or SCORE, a nonprofit group led by former U.S. Sen. Bill Frist that promotes college and career readiness, to counter foes of the common core in the state. Opponents began holding public forums last month where representatives from anti-common-core groups made their case.

On April 30, Score announced that more than 200 groups had signed on to its Expect More, Achieve More Coalition. The coalition, begun by SCORE in 2009 and revived last year to support the common core, includes state businesses and school districts and stresses what it says is the importance of the common core.

The coalition has geared up a social-media campaign to promote the standards. It also released a fact sheet and history that says in part, “Standards do not dictate curriculum (e.g., textbooks and reading lists) or prescribe a method of instruction.”

Mr. Huffman said he’s also lobbied to shore up common-core support among state legislators.

In an op-ed essay earlier this month in The Tennessean, in Nashville, state Sen. Dolores Gresham, a Republican and the chairwoman of the Senate education committee, said the standards would reverse the state’s history of having students perform well on state assessments but poorly on national tests that ask more of them.


Business Leaders for Michigan, a nonprofit group of private-sector leaders in that state, sent an open letter to state political leaders on May 2, urging them to stand by the new standards, after the state House of Representatives passed a budget last month that would defund the common core.

“Adopting the common core gives us even a better way of seeing how well we’re doing. And for the amount of money we’re spending on public education, we should want that,” Doug Rothwell, the president and CEO of Business Leaders for Michigan, said in an interview.


Stand for Children Indiana, a pro-common-core group, which supports broad early-education opportunities and charter schools, released two different 30-second TV advertisements, one on March 5 and another on April 16, defending the standards. The campaign also included radio spots.

via Education Week: Common Core Supporters Firing Back.


  1. George Manos says:

    This is an example of where educational standards are a benefit of federal government involvement as that group of business owners understand.

  2. wgersen says:

    Tennessee, Michigan, and Indiana pushing back on the common core because their Governors want to see public schools turned over to for-profit charters. The Common Core is essential to the privatization movement because it is linked to assessments that are being used to determine which public schools should be closed and turned over to charters. These assessments are being administered even though educators question the age appropriateness of some elements of the Common Core and even though some teachers have not had time to absorb the Common Core and develop lessons that match it. Unsurprisingly, those administering the assessments expect wholesale failure which will open the door for the expansion of privatization. Like many of my colleagues in public education, I do not oppose the Common Core per se… but find the tests that accompany the Common Core to be abhorrent.

    • Bill Duncan says:

      I think your first two sentences say it all. The privatization movement is independent of Common Core. Those governors want to privatize but CCSS is the evil federal government. They don’t need CCSS to privatize. It has no relationship to charters and vouchers.

      Any age inappropriate stuff may be a difference in judgment, not that big a deal and changeable.

      It’s true, scores will be lower because the standards will be higher. That’s a good thing. We need to step up to that and, in the mean time, beat back the privatization movement.

      I’ve got to go out, but to be continued.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: