Advancing New Hampshire Public Education

Home » Learn Everywhere » Conway School Board member Mark Hounsell: Learn Everywhere is “the biggest threat to public education”

Conway School Board member Mark Hounsell: Learn Everywhere is “the biggest threat to public education”

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

The last paragraph of the Conway Daily Sun article sums it up:

According to Hounsell, “The essential difference between Learn Everywhere and ELO’s is that Learn Everywhere is a program of private groups that precludes participation or decision-making by local school boards.”

Here are some highlights:

Conway School Board member Mark Hounsell pledged “to fight with all my being” to stop the state Department of Education’s proposed “Learn Everywhere” innovation because it takes away local control when it comes to students earning credits towards graduation. He called it “the biggest threat to public education” he’d ever seen.

At the Feb. 25 school board meeting, Hounsell and his colleagues agreed to write a letter to the state to oppose the initiative created by Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut and unveiled last month…..

“The new state rules and proposal will give more control to the state DOE. It will also require districts to award high school credits to any program, from anywhere, that can get a state department approval, regardless of whether it passes the rigors of our local high school,” Hounsell said.

Fellow board member Randy Davison agreed, specifically on the legislative section “Ed 1406.02 Issuing Credit for Graduation.”

In it, it says that “certificates shall be used to grant credit for graduation,” adding that “approved New Hampshire schools shall grant students with valid completion certificates high school credit leading to graduation in the area enumerated.”

“I’m very concerned by this,” Davison said. “Only local school districts should have authority to grant credits toward graduation.”

He added: “I think it’s not in the best interests of public education.”

In January, during a visit to the Sun, Edelblut spoke about the new innovation.

“Learn Everywhere is basically an opportunity to try and capture all student learning,” he said…..

Advancing New Hampshire Public Education, a website that advocates to improve public education, also opposed Senate Bill 435, which was passed by voice vote by legislators last spring.

The website was created and is run by Bill Duncan, a retired technology entrepreneur, who was born in Boston and lives in New Castle. He received the National Education Association of New Hampshire’s 2014 Communications Award.

On his website, Duncan stated: “Legislators and school administrators probably did not realize the trap that had been laid for them until the state Board of Education approved the initial draft of the rule required by that sentence.

“Under the proposed rule, the state board grants itself the authority to make use of the diploma issued by any local school board in New Hampshire. How is that possible? The state board would accredit (the rule calls it granting a ‘license’ to) any for-profit or non-profit group with a presence in New Hampshire, giving it the authority to issue academic credits which must be accepted by any New Hampshire high school,” he continued.

“The process is something like authorizing a charter school, but where a charter high school grants its own credits and diploma, ‘Learn Everywhere’ groups, as they are called, would have the authority to create credits in Laconia, Bow, Salem, Hanover or anywhere in the state.”….

Reaching Higher NH, which has a mission to foster and support public education, raised concerns on its website recently, saying that “Many noted (at the Feb. 14 meeting) that by giving the State Board the authority to grant academic credits, the Learn Everywhere program would supersede local control…..

In a follow-up interview, Hounsell urged the community to rally to stop the innovation.

“It is clear that Learn Everywhere is Commissioner Edelblut’s personal and highest priority project,” he said. “In addition to meeting one-on-one with the state board of education members to make the case for his program, and giving presentations urging supporters to communicate with the board, he organized some … relatively thin supportive testimony (at a DOE public hearing on Feb. 14). Two students who testified told others at the hearing that the commissioner had coached them personally in his office. At least one parent said he had contacted her to ask that she testify in support of the program.”…

Read the who report here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s