Home » Posts tagged 'SB 193'
Tag Archives: SB 193
House candidate Tom Loughman responds to Sen. Innis on school vouchers: “More spending, higher taxes, less opportunity”
Tom Loughman is a serious, high-energy candidate for the New Hampshire House from Hampton. He’s been tuned in to education issues and testified against SB 193 in the last legislative session.
And he shot right back when Sen. Dan Innis began advocating for an expanded voucher proposal. Here’s is Mr. Loughman’s authoritative response in today’s Seacoast Media papers. (more…)
Sen. Dan Innis: I believe in school choice for all New Hampshire children
School funding will be the big issue in the next legislative session. And here is Senator Dan Innis of New Castle running for re-election on his proposal to allocate New Hampshire’s scarce education dollars to private schools in the form of vouchers. And he wants to expand last year’s $100 million voucher bill, defeated in a bi-partisan vote, by making all wealthy children eligible for private school subsidies, leaving local property taxpayers to cover for reduced state funding.
Tom Loughman, candidate for state rep from Hampton, published a great response in the Seacoast Media papers today and here is nationally known education expert Scott Marion from Rye unpacking Mr. Innis erroneous assertions point by point. Bill Kingston of New Castle also responded in today’s papers.
Senator Innis making his case: (more…)
Why did fundamental good sense prevail on the voucher bill?
SB 193, the statewide voucher bill, appears to have been the highest legislative priority of the Governor and legislative leadership. It had the support of many Republicans who feel that the State should provide access to private schools in support of parental choice and student needs. Last fall, it looked sure to pass. But in the end, the House voted it down by the thinnest of margins.
Here’s a central reason:
Here are the roll-call votes on HB 1636. Please. Express your appreciation to House members who opposed this debilitating voucher program.
Actually, we’ll present these votes differently from in the past. There were two votes on HB 1636 on Thursday. The first was on the motion, “Non-concur, committee of conference.” The second was just “Non-concur.” We had urged House members in numerous one-on-one conversations to oppose both motions, for the reasons we outlined here. The complete official tally of each vote is available here. We will use this post to highlight those we should thank for voting with us. (more…)
SB 193 is dead for this year! The House voted 180-163 to “non-concur.” (…but get ready for next year.)
There’s nothing much more to say than to express thanks and appreciation to the many dozens of committed parents and volunteers who expressed their opposition to vouchers.
Please. Stay engaged. This bill and other challenges will be back before a new Legislature next year. Parents and others concerned about the future of public education in New Hampshire will need to maintain a strong, reasonable, rational voice in the policy process.
The House finds itself unable to fix the Senate’s voucher bill that most everyone considers a bad bill
It is widely agreed that the version of SB 193 that passed the Senate in March, 2017 is too costly to the general fund and still downshifts hundreds of millions of dollars in school funding responsibility to local taxpayers and has many other problems. But the House is finding that its options for fixing the bill are limited. (more…)
Reaching Higher NH: The voucher bill going to the House floor Thursday could cost millions in new state spending
As everyone knows, the Senate has sent HB 1636 back to the House amended to include the version of SB 193 passed by the Senate in March of 2017. Here is our overview of the voucher provisions of the bill.
The Senate amendment to HB 1636 is widely considered a placeholder for more work to be done on the bill in a committee of conference. However, some supporters prefer this swing-for-the-fences voucher program the subsequent versions that incorporated some limitations in response to a flood of criticism. And the whole Legislature seems to have become impatient and cranky, just worn out by the Governor’s over-the-top pressure to pass something salable nationally as a school choice win. So there’s no telling where all this will lead. (more…)
There is no need for a committee of conference on HB 1636 (SB 193) – the House should vote Non-Concur.
Update on the effort to resuscitate SB 193: action through the end of the session
The expectation at this point is that the House Education Committee will recommend that the amended HB 1636 be sent to a committee of conference and that the House will vote on that on May 10. Here is the amendment adding SB 193 to HB 1636. (This amendment, “Death Benefit for School Employee Killed in Line of Duty” was also added to HB 1636)
The House could kill the bill then and there but if it agrees to the committee of conference, the Speaker will name the committee members, probably then and there, and the committee will prepare its report. The version of SB 193 added to HB 1636 is a version that the Senate passed in March, 2017 and that no one considers viable at this point. The committee of conference will probably replace it with a version much like the one the House voted down this week.
The House would vote on the committee of conference report at the May 23 session. If it passes, it will go immediately to the Senate. If it fails, it is dead at that point. The last day of the current legislative session is scheduled to be May 24.
Both the Concord Monitor (here) and the Union Leader (here) have provided updates on last night’s Senate action. (more…)
The Senate has amended HB 1636 to include the language from SB 193
At 9:30 tonight (Thursday), the Senate amended HB 1636, creating a study committee about charter school teacher preparation and making unused district school facilities available to charter schools, to include the language of SB 193.
It is not clear which version of SB 193 the Senate amended into HB 1636 nor is it clear whether the amended bill will go to a conference committee or straight to the House floor for an an up or down vote on a motion to concur.
Update, 5/3 at 10:40: Here is the amended version of HB 1636, The added language is the version that passed the Senate in March of 2017.
To be continued.